Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 vs. Asics Gel-Kayano 31 Review

In the world of stability running shoes, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and the Asics Gel-Kayano 31 are two standout models that offer top-tier support and comfort. As a foot and ankle specialist, I’ll walk you through the key specifications of each shoe, explaining how they impact your feet whether you’re walking, standing, or running. From cushioning to fit and stability, let’s explore which of these stability shoes might be the right choice for you.

Cushioning: Soft vs. Extra Soft

Each shoe provides ample cushioning but with subtle differences that affect their feel and performance:

  • Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24: This shoe features 35mm of cushion in the heel and 23mm in the forefoot, providing a 12mm heel-to-toe drop. The Adrenaline uses DNA Loft V3 nitrogen-infused foam, which is light and moderately plush, offering a firm yet comfortable ride. This lighter cushioning makes it easier for uptempo runs but slightly firmer than the Gel-Kayano.
  • Asics Gel-Kayano 31: With 40mm of cushioning in the heel and 30mm in the forefoot, the Gel-Kayano provides a 10mm drop, which feels softer and more cushioned underfoot. The FF Blast+ foam combined with a gel insert offers a highly plush and cloud-like feel. This additional cushioning is ideal for longer, slower runs and provides more comfort for those who stand or walk for extended periods.

Stability Features: Medial Support and Sidewalls

Both models are crafted for maximum stability, though they achieve this in different ways:

  • Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24: Utilises the GuideRails support system, which includes a firm medial post extending from the heel to the midfoot, resisting excessive inward motion and supporting your arch. This shoe also has added sole flare, where the base of the shoe widens for a stable platform. Sidewalls come up along the forefoot and rearfoot, keeping the foot centred during movement.
  • Asics Gel-Kayano 31: Features 4D Guidance System technology, which includes a wide base of support, extra sole flare, and firm sidewalls for added stability, especially in the rearfoot. The 4D Guidance System is slightly more centralized, with resilient cushioning under the arch that gives bounce-back, supporting your foot against pronation forces. The overall stability feel is softer than the Adrenaline but offers a balanced, centred ride.

Buy Shoes on Amazon

Heel Bevel and Rocker: Smooth Transitions

The heel bevel and forefoot rocker can influence the smoothness of your heel-to-toe transitions:

  • Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24: Comes with an enhanced posterior heel bevel, making transitions from heel to midfoot feel smoother than in previous versions. This shoe has a moderate mid-to-forefoot rocker that promotes a natural gait cycle, helping with long-distance comfort and efficient push-off.
  • Asics Gel-Kayano 31: The Gel-Kayano has a slightly more aggressive forefoot rocker than the Adrenaline, aiding in faster propulsion during runs. The toe spring in this model holds the toes in a slight extension, which can benefit speed but may feel uncomfortable for those with toe conditions.

Fit and Comfort: Roomy with Plush Uppers

Both shoes prioritize comfort, but slight differences in fit and upper design may make one better suited to specific foot types:

  • Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24: Features a moderately roomy toe box with a slightly lower volume than the Kayano, which some may find more secure. Brooks offers a range of widths, including narrow, regular, wide, and extra-wide. The upper is padded but firm, and the non-gusseted tongue is held in place by lace tabs, which prevents movement without bulk.
  • Asics Gel-Kayano 31: Offers a wider forefoot fit with extra volume and a plush sock-like upper, making it ideal for those who prefer a softer fit. The gusseted tongue prevents slipping, and with normal, wide, and extra-wide options, it accommodates a variety of foot shapes.
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 vs Gel Kayano 31 side by side comparison photos with the adrenaline on top of the kayano

Heel Counter: Stiff Support for Added Stability

Both models feature stiff heel counters, essential for a stability shoe, be cautious if you have Haglund’s deformity or other heel sensitivities, as this firmness can cause discomfort. The heel counters in both models offer luxurious padding and secure lockdown, keeping the foot stable without side-to-side motion.

Conditions Supported by These Shoes

Both the Adrenaline GTS 24 and Gel-Kayano 31 offer features that can benefit specific foot conditions:

  • Achilles Tendonitis: The heel drop in both shoes (12mm in the Adrenaline, 10mm in the Kayano) helps offload the Achilles tendon, which can reduce pain and strain.
  • Plantar Fasciitis and Posterior Tibial Tendinitis: The medial arch support and stability elements in both models help control overpronation, reducing strain on the posterior tibial tendon and plantar fascia.
  • Metatarsalgia and Morton’s Neuroma: The Gel-Kayano’s additional forefoot cushioning (30mm) helps absorb impact and reduce vibration, providing comfort for those with forefoot conditions.

Buy Shoes on Amazon

Which Shoe is Right for You?

  • Asics Gel-Kayano 31: This shoe is ideal for those looking for maximum stability and a plush, cloud-like feel. It’s best suited for longer, slower runs, recovery runs, and extended periods of standing or walking. The Gel-Kayano’s softer cushioning and enhanced forefoot padding make it especially beneficial for those with forefoot conditions.
  • Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24: A solid choice if you need stability but prefer a slightly firmer cushioning that is more responsive. With a bit less volume in the upper, it provides a more secure fit and is lighter than the Gel-Kayano, making it suitable for moderate-paced daily runs and longer distances. The Adrenaline is also excellent for walking or standing all day, but keep in mind it’s firmer underfoot.

Final Thoughts

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and the Asics Gel-Kayano 31 are superb stability shoes, each offering unique strengths. The Gel-Kayano focuses on maximum cushioning and comfort, making it a great choice for recovery and long-distance runs. Meanwhile, the Adrenaline GTS 24 balances firm support with lighter weight, ideal for those seeking responsive stability.

If you have any questions about the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 or the Asics Gel-Kayano 31, feel free to leave a comment below. Be sure to like and subscribe for more reviews and in-depth comparisons of stability shoes from top brands!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top