Hoka Clifton 9 vs Mach 6

Hi, I’m James, a knee, foot, and ankle specialist with over 10 years of experience helping people find the right footwear. Today, I’m breaking down the Hoka Mach 6 and Hoka Clifton 9, two highly regarded models in the Hoka range. These shoes cater to different needs, so we’ll explore their performance, cushioning, stability, fit, and design in detail to help you decide which one suits you best.


Cushioning and Performance

Hoka Mach 6

  • Stack Heights: 37mm in the rearfoot and 32mm in the forefoot, with a 5mm heel-to-toe drop.
  • Cushioning: The supercritical foam midsole is Hoka’s premium performance material. It’s lightweight, highly responsive, and provides excellent energy return. When your foot makes contact with the ground, the foam compresses slightly before snapping back, propelling you forward with each step.
  • Weight: At 235g (men’s size 9 US), the Mach 6 is lighter than the Clifton 9, making it ideal for speed work.
  • Best For: A performance-oriented runner looking for a snappy, fast, responsive shoe. It is ideal for uptempo runs, fartlek training, and races ranging from 5K to 20K.

Hoka Clifton 9

  • Stack Heights: 32mm in the rearfoot and 27mm in the forefoot, also with a 5mm drop.
  • Cushioning: The shoe features Hoka’s CMEVA foam midsole, offering a softer, more balanced ride than the Mach 6. While still moderately responsive, it doesn’t deliver the same snap as the supercritical foam but excels in comfort and durability.
  • Weight: Slightly heavier at 249g (men’s size 9 US).
  • Best For: A versatile, all-rounder shoe suitable for daily runs, long walks, recovery sessions, and slower-paced training.

Buy Shoes on Amazon

Picture of the Hoka Clifton 9 from the side

Stability Features

While both shoes are considered neutral, they have distinct stability elements to improve comfort and support:

Hoka Mach 6

  • Sidewalls: Features mild sidewalls from the heel to the midfoot on both sides and the forefoot, providing subtle guidance and stability without feeling intrusive.
  • Base Support: The narrower base and minimal sole flare reduce the amount of ground contact, emphasizing lightweight performance over maximum stability.
  • Outsole Design: The flatter outsole offers less traction, making it better suited for dry, paved surfaces.

Hoka Clifton 9

  • Sidewalls: The Clifton 9 has more pronounced sidewalls that cradle the foot from the heel to midfoot, helping to centre the foot within the shoe.
  • Base Support: A broader base and sole flare—where the sole extends beyond the foot—enhance ground contact and improve overall stability.
  • Outsole Design: The outsole includes traction pods, providing better grip on wet surfaces or light trails.

Upper Design and Fit

The upper material and fit are other key areas where these shoes differ:

Hoka Mach 6

  • Upper Material: Made with a jacquard creel mesh, the upper is extremely lightweight and breathable, designed to reduce weight and maximize airflow. While ideal for warmer weather or intense runs, it may feel colder in winter.
  • Fit: The Mach 6 has a tapered, narrow toe box, which may feel snug for those with wider feet. A wide-fit version is available, which is recommended for anyone who typically struggles with narrow shoes.
  • Tongue: Thin and minimally padded, contributing to the shoe’s lightweight, race-ready feel.

Hoka Clifton 9

  • Upper Material: Features a more plush engineered knit upper, prioritizing comfort over weight reduction. It provides a sock-like fit that’s softer and more luxurious.
  • Fit: The Clifton 9 offers slightly more room in the toe box than the Mach 6, but it still tapers slightly. Wide-fit options are also available for those who need extra space.
  • Tongue: A gusseted, padded tongue provides a secure, comfortable fit, preventing it from slipping during use.

Buy Shoes on Amazon

Picture of the Hoka Mach 6 from the side

Heel Counter and Overall Comfort

Hoka Mach 6

  • Heel Counter: Mild to moderately stiff, offering just enough support to keep the heel stable without adding excess weight.
  • Comfort: Designed with performance in mind, the Mach 6 prioritizes responsiveness over plush comfort. While still comfortable, it feels more stripped-back compared to the Clifton 9.

Hoka Clifton 9

  • Heel Counter: Features a moderately stiff heel counter with plush padding, creating a secure, supportive, and comfortable fit for long-term use.
  • Comfort: The Clifton 9 excels in overall comfort, making it an ideal choice for extended runs, long walks, or all-day wear.

Outsole Design and Traction

Hoka Mach 6

  • Outsole Design: The flatter outsole is designed for speed, with less emphasis on grip. It performs well on dry, paved roads but may not provide sufficient traction on wet or uneven surfaces.

Hoka Clifton 9

  • Outsole Design: The addition of traction pods improves grip on wet roads and light trails, making the Clifton 9 a more versatile option for mixed terrain.

Which Shoe is Right for You?

  • Choose the Hoka Mach 6 if:
    • You’re a performance-focused runner looking for a lightweight, snappy shoe.
    • You prioritize speed and responsiveness for uptempo runs or races.
    • You prefer a more stripped-back design with a breathable upper.
  • Choose the Hoka Clifton 9 if:
    • You want a versatile, all-purpose trainer for daily use.
    • You need a shoe with more stability and traction for mixed terrain.
    • You prefer a plush, comfortable upper for long-distance runs or walks.

Final Thoughts

The Hoka Mach 6 and Clifton 9 are outstanding shoes but serve different purposes. The Mach 6 is perfect for runners seeking a lightweight, performance-oriented shoe with exceptional energy return. At the same time, the Clifton 9 is a durable, versatile workhorse designed to provide comfort and stability for various activities.

If you’re considering either of these shoes, or other Hoka shoes check out our other reviews to learn more.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top