Hoka Clifton 9 vs Asics Novablast 5

Hi, I’m James, a foot and ankle specialist, and today we’re comparing two standout shoes in the running world: the Hoka Clifton 9 and the Asics Novablast 5. Both shoes are built for comfort and versatility but have key differences in cushioning, fit, and performance. By the end of this post, you’ll have a clear idea of which shoe suits your needs best.


Cushioning: Responsive vs. Bouncy

Hoka Clifton 9

The Clifton 9 features CMEVA cushioning, which is known for its responsive feel. You sink into the shoe slightly upon contact, but the energy return pushes you back out, making it ideal for runners who like a smooth ride without losing propulsion. With 32 mm of cushioning in the heel and 27 mm in the forefoot, it has a 5 mm drop, classifying it as a low-drop shoe.

If you’re looking for something even softer within the Hoka range. In that case, you might consider the Hoka Bondi 8, which provides more plush cushioning, or the snappier Hoka Mach 6 if responsiveness is your priority.

ASICS Novablast 5

The Novablast 5 takes a different approach with its FF BlastMax cushioning, which is softer and bouncier than its predecessor, the Novablast 4. It features 41.5 mm of cushioning in the heel and 33.5 mm in the forefoot, creating an 8 mm drop. This design adds a slight forward tilt but it’s much less noticeable than in the Novablast 4, making the shoe feel smoother in transitions.

For those seeking even more plushness, the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 26 offers an ultra-soft ride with similar energy return for longer runs or all-day wear.

Picture of the Asics Novablast 5 from the medial side at annecy lake

Performance: Versatility for Daily Runs

Both shoes shine as versatile daily trainers, but there are subtle differences in their use cases:

Hoka Clifton 9

The Clifton 9 is a workhorse trainer perfect for:

  • Long runs
  • Recovery runs
  • Easy daily runs
    It’s durable, lightweight, and responsive enough to handle light, uptempo work. For faster, performance-focused runs, you might look at the Hoka Mach 6.

ASICS Novablast 5

The Novablast 5 has shifted from being a performance trainer (as seen in the Novablast 4) to a more balanced everyday trainer. It’s ideal for:

  • Daily runs
  • Longer mileage runs
  • Recovery sessions
    The shoe delivers exceptional durability, with minimal wear even after 40-50K. If you’re after a more performance-driven ASICS model, the Asics Superblast 2 could be a better choice.
Picture of a silver pair of the Hoka Clifton 9 from the side at lake annecy

Fit: Narrow vs. Spacious

Hoka Clifton 9

Hoka shoes are known for their slightly tapered toe boxes, and the Clifton 9 follows suit. While it offers a snug fit in the midfoot and heel, the toe box might feel narrow for runners with wider feet. Thankfully, the Clifton 9 is available in wide options, which can accommodate broader feet.

For a Hoka shoe with more room in the forefoot, consider the Hoka Bondi 8, which has a wider and more spacious fit.

ASICS Novablast 5

The Novablast 5 offers a spacious toe box, making it more comfortable for runners with normal-to-wide feet. While it doesn’t currently come in a wide version, the previous Novablast 4 did, so it’s likely a wide option will follow. If you prefer even more width and splay room, check out the Topo Atmos or the Brooks Ghost Max 2, both of which are excellent wide-fit options.


Upper: Comfort and Lockdown

Both shoes feature engineered mesh uppers, but their designs cater to different preferences:

  • The Clifton 9 has a padded, gusseted tongue and a lower heel counter, offering a plush, locked-in feel.
  • The Novablast 5 has a thinner, gusseted tongue and a higher heel counter for a sleeker fit.

Both shoes provide moderate rigidity in the heel, ensuring comfort without unnecessary stiffness.


Durability and Weight

  • Hoka Clifton 9: Lightweight and versatile at 275g (Men’s US 9), but slightly less durable than the Novablast 5.
  • ASICS Novablast 5: Heavier at 297g (Men’s US 9), but its outsole durability is outstanding, with minimal wear after extensive mileage.

If weight is a significant factor for you, the Brooks Launch 10 is a lighter, more affordable alternative for daily use.


Which Shoe Should You Choose?

  • Choose the Hoka Clifton 9 if you want a responsive workhorse trainer that can handle a variety of runs, including uptempo and recovery sessions. It’s also a great option if you prefer a snugger fit in the toe box or need a wide option.
  • Go for the ASICS Novablast 5 if you’re after a bouncier, softer ride that excels in durability and comfort for longer mileage or everyday training.

Final Thoughts

Both the Hoka Clifton 9 and ASICS Novablast 5 are excellent daily trainers, each with unique strengths. Whether you prioritize responsive cushioning or a bouncier, softer feel, there’s a shoe here for you.

If you have any questions, feel free to leave a comment below! And if you’re ready to buy, we’ve included links in the description—purchasing through them supports the channel without affecting the price you pay.

1 thought on “Hoka Clifton 9 vs Asics Novablast 5”

  1. I found the midsole cushioning in the Novablast 5 to be lacking but they feel great!!! So I tried the Hoka Bondi 8 and the midsole was too narrow and would no doubt produce blisters. I’m retired and I volunteer at a food bank, so I’m standing on concrete for 4 hours at a time. I have SEVERE osteoarthritis in my knees. My search continues for the perfect shoe and I welcome suggestions.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top