Let’s take a closer look at the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and the Asics GT-2000 13, two fan favourites in the stability shoe category. Both have seen updates to their midsoles in these latest models, but they cater to slightly different needs. By the end of this post, you’ll clearly understand how these shoes stack up and which one might suit you best.
Cushioning and Midsole
Both shoes have undergone significant updates to their midsoles, but the feel underfoot is entirely different.
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24:
- Features the DNA Loft V3 nitrogen-infused midsole, which provides balanced cushioning. It feels softer and more comfortable than previous versions but still offers decent energy return.
- Stack Height: 35mm (heel) / 23mm (forefoot).
- Heel-to-Toe Drop: 12mm – This traditional high-drop design helps offload pressure from the Achilles tendon, making it ideal for those needing extra support.
- Weight: 283g (Men’s US 9).
Asics GT-2000 13:
- It is equipped with firmer cushioning for a snappier ride, making it more suitable for uptempo running than earlier models.
- Stack Height: 36mm (heel) / 28mm (forefoot).
- Heel-to-Toe Drop: 8mm – A slightly lower drop gives it a more balanced feel during the gait cycle.
- Weight: 266g (Men’s US 9) – noticeably lighter than the Adrenaline.
If you prefer a softer, more cushioned ride, the Adrenaline is your go-to. For those seeking a firmer, faster shoe, the GT-2000 has the edge.
Stability Features
Both shoes excel at providing stability but achieve it in very different ways.
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24:
- Go-To Support (GTS) System: This medial support runs from the heel through the midfoot, using denser foam to control pronation forces. It’s ideal for runners who need moderate to maximum stability.
- Sole Flare: A wider forefoot base keeps your foot centred during push-off.
- Heel Counter: Stiff and supportive, it helps cradle the heel and adds extra stability.
Asics GT-2000 13:
- Sidewalls: The midfoot sidewalls on both the medial and lateral sides cradle the heel for added stability.
- Heel Counter: Moderately stiff, providing support without feeling restrictive.
- Sole Flare: Broad base and forefoot flare contribute to stability but don’t offer the same level of medial support as the Adrenaline.
The Adrenaline is better suited for those who need significant pronation control, while the GT-2000 is an excellent choice if you’re after mild stability.
Upper and Fit
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24:
- Material: Plush knit upper for a more premium feel.
- Fit: Roomy in the toe box, offering comfort for wider feet or long runs.
- Tongue and Heel Padding: Generously padded for extra comfort, which adds to its slightly heavier weight.
Asics GT-2000 13:
- Material: Engineered mesh upper for a snug, race-like feel.
- Fit: Narrower in the toe box, so it’s better suited for those with medium to narrow feet.
- Tongue and Heel Padding: Lightweight and semi-gusseted, providing a secure fit without excess bulk.
If you have wider feet or prefer a more relaxed fit, the Adrenaline will feel more accommodating. For a secure, performance-oriented fit, the GT-2000 is the way to go.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Feature | Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 | Asics GT-2000 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | Softer, balanced feel | Firmer, snappier feel |
| Stack Height | 35mm (heel) / 23mm (forefoot) | 36mm (heel) / 28mm (forefoot) |
| Drop | 12mm | 8mm |
| Weight | 283g (Men’s US 9) | 266g (Men’s US 9) |
| Stability Level | Moderate to maximum | Mild to moderate |
| Toe Box Fit | Roomier | Narrower |
| Use Case | Recovery runs, long runs | Uptempo, daily training |
Use Cases
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24:
- Perfect for recovery runs and long-distance cruising.
- Great for standing or walking all day, thanks to its cushioned midsole.
- Offers more control for runners who overpronate.
If you enjoy shoes like the Brooks Ghost 16 but need added stability, the Adrenaline is a natural progression.
Asics GT-2000 13:
- Ideal for uptempo runs and shorter distances.
- Works well for neutral runners who need a touch of support.
- Another responsive stability option is the Hoka Arahi 7.
Final Thoughts
Both the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and the Asics GT-2000 13 are excellent stability shoes, but they serve different purposes. The Adrenaline is better for those who need significant pronation control and prefer a balanced, cushioned feel. At the same time, the GT-2000 is perfect for runners looking for a lighter, firmer, and more performance-oriented stability shoe.
If you’re still undecided, check out our full reviews of the Brooks Glycerin 22 and the Asics Gel-Nimbus 27 for more neutral running shoe options. As always, feel free to drop your questions in the comments below!
If you found this comparison helpful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe. It supports our channel and helps us bring you more detailed reviews. Thank you for reading!
