The Brooks Glycerin Max and Hoka Bondi 9 are two of the most cushioned running shoes on the market, but they serve different purposes in terms of performance, comfort, and foot support. This comparison will break down their fit, cushioning, stability, and use cases to help determine which shoe is better for walking, standing, and running.
For those looking for additional max cushion options, check out the New Balance 1080v13 or Asics Gel-Nimbus 27, which offer soft, plush midsoles in a slightly different design.
Upper Fit and Comfort
Hoka Bondi 9 – More Toe Box Space, Snug Heel Lockdown
The Bondi 9 has had a significant upgrade from the Bondi 8, particularly in the toe box width:
- Now true to size in width and length, whereas the Bondi 8 ran narrow.
- Available in wide and extra-wide versions, making it an excellent option for those needing more forefoot space.
- Snug heel lockdown, but some may experience pressure on the back of the heel, which could be uncomfortable for those with Haglund’s deformity or Achilles issues.
Brooks Glycerin Max – Spacious Toe Box, Softer Heel Fit
- The toe box is spacious and accommodates a variety of foot shapes, but it does not come in wide or extra-wide options.
- The gusseted, padded tongue offers a plush feel similar to the Bondi 9.
- Flexible heel counter, reducing pressure on the back of the foot, making it a better option for those with sensitive Achilles or bursitis.
Verdict on Fit:
Due to its extra width options, the Bondi 9 is a better choice for those needing a wide forefoot. However, if heel sensitivity is a concern, the Glycerin Max offers a more forgiving fit.
For other shoes with wide-toe boxes, consider the Altra Via Olympus 2 or Topo Atmos, both designed with anatomical foot-shaped uppers.
Check the price of the shoes on Amazon:
Midsole Cushioning and Ride
Brooks Glycerin Max – Soft, Responsive, and Unique Midsole
The Glycerin Max features a DNA Tuned Nitrogen-Infused Midsole designed to balance softness and energy return:
- Large cells in the rearfoot help absorb impact.
- Smaller, denser forefoot cells create a spring effect, aiding propulsion.
- It feels softer underfoot without being mushy—plush but with better responsiveness than many max-cushion shoes.
- An aggressive late forefoot rocker facilitates a smooth push-off without excessive toe spring, making it a good option for conditions like metatarsalgia.
Hoka Bondi 9 – Plush Comfort for Long Hours
The Bondi 9 introduces supercritical foam instead of the CMEVA midsole from the Bondi 8:
- Ultra-soft, cloud-like feel—ideal for walking and standing all day.
- Stable cushioning—while soft, it does not feel overly mushy like the New Balance 1080v13.
- Lacks energy return, making it harder to pick up the pace during runs.
- Features Hoka’s signature meta-rocker, but has slightly more toe spring than the Glycerin Max.
Verdict on Cushioning:
The Bondi 9 is best for pure comfort, walking, and standing, while the Glycerin Max offers similar cushioning with better responsiveness, making it a better option for running.
For those who prefer a softer ride without sacrificing energy return, the Saucony Triumph 21 or ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 might also be worth considering.
Stability and Performance
Hoka Bondi 9 – Stable Yet Slower
- 5mm drop with 43mm rearfoot stack / 38mm forefoot stack.
- Stable neutral shoe, with a wide platform and slight forefoot stiffness.
- Lacks responsiveness for speed work, but excels at long, easy runs and walking.
Brooks Glycerin Max – More Versatile and Performance-Oriented
- 6mm drop with 45mm rearfoot stack / 39mm forefoot stack.
- While also a neutral shoe, it has more flexibility and energy return, making it better suited for long runs and recovery efforts.
- The forefoot rocker aids propulsion, making transitions smoother than the Bondi 9.
Verdict on Stability and Performance:
For those needing a pure max cushion stability shoe, the Bondi 9 is a great walking option. For those looking for more versatility, the Glycerin Max is better for both running and walking.
For other performance-focused max cushion shoes, check out the Hoka Clifton 9 or Saucony Ride 18.
Check the price of the shoes on Amazon:
Use Cases – Which One Is Best for You?
| Feature | Brooks Glycerin Max | Hoka Bondi 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Running & Walking | Walking & Long Hours Standing |
| Cushioning | Plush & Responsive | Plush & Stable |
| Heel Drop | 6mm | 5mm |
| Toe Box Width | Normal | Normal / Wide / Extra-Wide |
| Performance | Recovery Runs & Easy Runs | Walking & Recovery Runs |
| Forefoot Rocker | Aggressive, Late-Stage | Classic Hoka Rocker |
| Energy Return | Moderate | Low |
- Choose the Brooks Glycerin Max if looking for a plush, max-cushion shoe that still offers a smooth ride for running.
- Choose the Hoka Bondi 9 if looking for a super soft, stable shoe for walking and all-day wear.
Final Thoughts – Which One Stands Out?
Both shoes excel in their respective categories, but they serve different purposes:
- For walking, standing all day, and pure comfort, the Hoka Bondi 9 is the better choice.
- For running and a more versatile max cushion experience, the Brooks Glycerin Max takes the edge.
For additional recommendations, explore the Shoe Comparisons Category for more in-depth breakdowns.
Medical Disclaimer:
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Those experiencing foot pain or injury should consult a qualified healthcare professional before selecting footwear.
