If you’re after a neutral running shoe for daily training, walking, or easy runs, the Asics Gel Cumulus 27 and Asics Novablast 5 are two of the top contenders for 2025. They’re both lightweight, well-cushioned, and versatile—but they feel completely different once you start running.
In this comparison, we’ll break down how each shoe performs underfoot, how they fit, and which is better suited to your goals.
Midsole Performance and Cushioning
Let’s start with what really matters—how the shoes feel underfoot.
- The Gel Cumulus 27 features FF Blast cushioning, which provides a balanced and slightly responsive ride. You get some sink on impact, but it rebounds nicely when you push off. This gives it a smooth, controlled transition whether you’re walking or running.
- Stack height: 37.5 mm heel / 29.5 mm forefoot
- Drop: 8 mm
- On the other hand, the Novablast 5 steps it up with FF Blast+ Max, which delivers a softer, bouncier, and more energetic ride. This is a fun, springy shoe that’s made to bounce back with each step. It’s excellent for those who want more of a pop during runs.
- Stack height: 41.5 mm heel / 33.5 mm forefoot
- Drop: 8 mm
If you’re someone who enjoys a bit more structure and ground feel, the Cumulus 27 will suit you better. But if you’re looking for a dynamic ride and enjoy shoes like the Hoka Mach 6 with their energetic toe-off, the Novablast 5 is a clear winner.
Stability and Support
- The Gel Cumulus 27 is classified as a stable neutral shoe. It offers:
- Moderate sidewalls on both sides of the heel
- A stiff heel counter
- Sole flare for a wide base of support
- The Novablast 5, while technically a neutral shoe, does include some sidewalls and flare—but its softer foam means it compresses more under pressure. This makes it slightly less stable than the Cumulus 27. If you have stability needs, you might prefer something like the Asics Gel-Kayano 31, which are built for more structured support.
Check the latest prices on Amazon:
Fit and Upper Feel
Both shoes are true to size and come in wide versions, which is great for those with broader feet.
- Cumulus 27:
- Padded heel collar
- Gusseted tongue for a secure fit
- Slightly stiffer heel counter for better lockdown
- Novablast 5:
- Lightweight mesh upper
- Thinner tongue and more flexible heel
- Designed to shave down weight for performance
For reference, the Cumulus 27 weighs 264g (Men’s US 9), while the Novablast 5 comes in a touch lighter around 255g.
If you’ve tried the Asics Gel-Nimbus 27, you’ll find the Cumulus 27 slightly firmer but more versatile for both running and casual wear. And compared to the Brooks Glycerin 22, the Novablast 5 offers a far more energetic, performance-oriented ride, while the Glycerin is better suited for soft, cushioned daily walks and recovery runs.
Running and Daily Use: Which Is Better?
| Feature | Asics Gel Cumulus 27 | Asics Novablast 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (US M9) | 264g | ~255g |
| Drop | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Cushioning | FF Blast (Balanced) | FF Blast+ Max (Springy) |
| Ride Feel | Smooth, controlled | Soft, bouncy |
| Stability | Stable Neutral | Neutral |
| Best For | Walking, Easy Runs, Daily | Faster Workouts, Long Runs |
| Fit | Structured, Secure | Lightweight, Breathable |
| Wide Fit Available | Yes | Yes |
Check the latest prices on Amazon:
Final Thoughts
Choose the Asics Gel Cumulus 27 if you:
- Prefer a balanced ride with some stability
- Are looking for an all-day shoe for standing or walking
- Want a daily trainer for 5K to 10K runs with reliable comfort
Choose the Asics Novablast 5 if you:
- Want more bounce and energy return
- Plan to use the shoe mainly for running
- Enjoy a lighter, more performance-driven design
