Hi, I’m James, a foot and ankle specialist, and today we’re diving into the ASICS GT-2000 13. This shoe remains one of the top moderate stability options in ASICS’s lineup, but there are a few key updates from the GT-2000 12. In this review, I’ll break down the cushioning, stability, and upper fit changes and help you decide if upgrading is worth it.
We’ll also discuss how these features can impact comfort and any foot issues you may have, and I’ll point you to other great stability shoe options like the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and the New Balance 860 v14.
Cushioning: Firmer and Snappier in the GT-2000 13
The GT-2000 12 was known for being one of the best moderate stability shoes on the market. It offered plenty of cushioning with a soft, plush feel and was surprisingly lightweight and snappy, making it great for uptempo runs.
In the GT-2000 13, ASICS made a few changes:
- Stack Height: The GT-2000 13 has a bit more stack height, especially in the heel. This extra cushioning helps with comfort on heel strikes.
- Feel: The cushioning is a little firmer and snappier than the 12. It still uses the FF Blast+ foam and PureGEL in the midfoot and forefoot, but the feel is different. You don’t get the same plush softness throughout the shoe.
If you prefer a softer ride, you might enjoy the ASICS Gel-Kayano 31, which offers more luxurious cushioning while maintaining excellent stability.
Stability: More Aggressive Sidewalls
Both the GT-2000 12 and 13 provide excellent stability features, but the GT-2000 13 takes it up a notch:
- Wider Base: Both models offer a wide base of support, especially in the midfoot, to help with overpronation.
- Sidewalls: The sidewalls in the GT-2000 13 are more aggressive. They come up higher on the medial (inner) side, which can provide more foot cradling.
- For some, this might feel more supportive.
- Others might find this extra pressure on the inner heel a bit uncomfortable or blister-inducing.
If you’re looking for a stability shoe that offers a smoother, less aggressive ride, consider the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 or the Saucony Guide 17. Both provide excellent stability without feeling too intrusive.
Upper Fit: Tighter Toe Box in the GT-2000 13
The fit of the upper is another area where the GT-2000 13 differs from the GT-2000 12:
- Volume: The GT-2000 13 has less volume in the upper, making it less of a snug, sock-like fit compared to the 12.
- Toe Box: The toe box on the GT-2000 13 tapers earlier, which might feel a bit tight for those with broader feet.
- Thankfully, ASICS offers the shoe in normal, wide, and extra-wide versions.
If you need a wide toe box with a secure heel and midfoot, the Topo Atmos is another excellent max-cushion option with an anatomical fit.
Other Features: Small Details That Matter
- Tongue: Both models have a thin, gusseted tongue, providing good lockdown without excess bulk.
- Heel Counter: The heel counter in both models is moderately stiff, offering good ankle stability.
- Pull Tab: The GT-2000 13 includes a pull tab on the heel, making it easier to slip on – a small but handy addition!
Is It Worth Upgrading to the GT-2000 13?
The GT-2000 13 offers firmer cushioning, more aggressive sidewalls, and a slightly tighter fit than the GT-2000 12. If you’re happy with the GT-2000 12 and it’s still available, you might want to stick with it. However, if you’re looking for a bit more snappiness and foot cradling, the GT-2000 13 could be worth the upgrade.
Final Thoughts
The ASICS GT-2000 13 remains a reliable moderate stability shoe with a few notable changes. Running, walking, or standing all day offers solid support and a firmer feel.
If you have any questions about the GT-2000 13 or need help choosing the right shoe, comment below! And if you found this helpful, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe – it helps support our channel.
