At Flawless Shoe Reviews, we’re comparing two of ASICS’ most popular stability running shoes: the GT-2000 14 and the Gel-Kayano 32. Whether you’re looking for a reliable daily trainer, a comfortable walking shoe, or a pair to support mild to moderate pronation, this guide breaks down the 5 key differences so you can choose the right shoe for your needs.
1. Cushioning Type and Feel
ASICS GT-2000 14
- Midsole Foam: FF BLASTMAX
- Feel: Bouncy, responsive
- Similar to: ASICS Novablast 5, Hoka Arahi 8
- Purpose: Designed for energy return and faster paces
ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
- Midsole Foam: FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO
- Feel: Plush, soft, cloud-like
- Similar to: Brooks Glycerin GTS 22, Hoka Gaviota 5
- Purpose: Comfort-focused with a luxurious step-in feel
Key Difference: The GT-2000 feels lighter and more responsive, ideal for performance and faster runs. The Kayano 32 offers a much softer, more cushioned experience best suited for comfort and longer wear.
2. Stack Height and Drop
| Shoe | Rearfoot Stack | Forefoot Stack | Drop | Weight (US Men’s 9) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT-2000 14 | 36.5 mm | 28.5 mm | 8 mm | 273g |
| Kayano 32 | 40 mm | 32 mm | 8 mm | 300g |
Both shoes share the same 8mm drop, but the Kayano 32 has more overall cushioning, making it heavier but significantly more plush underfoot.
Check the latest prices on Amazon:
3. Stability Systems
Gel-Kayano 32 – 4D Guidance System:
- Sidewalls on both sides of the heel
- Sole flare for a wide, stable base
- Medial arch support built in
- Stable yet plush – ideal for overpronators who need maximum support
GT-2000 14 – 3D Guidance System:
- Sidewalls for structure
- Sole flare and wide base
- No direct arch support – mild to moderate stability without pressing into your arch
Key Difference: If you want firm arch support, go for the Kayano 32. If you prefer stability without pressure underfoot, the GT-2000 14 offers a more subtle guidance system.
4. Upper Fit and Comfort
| Feature | GT-2000 14 | Kayano 32 |
|---|---|---|
| Upper Mesh | Lightweight woven mesh | Plusher engineered mesh |
| Toe Box | True to size, spacious | True to size, spacious |
| Tongue | Thin, gusseted | Thin, gusseted |
| Heel Collar | Padded, comfortable | Extra plush, with pull tab |
The GT-2000 14 is more breathable and lightweight—great for hot weather or running. The Kayano 32 offers a warmer, softer feel ideal for colder conditions or all-day wear.
Check the latest prices on Amazon:
5. Running vs Lifestyle Use
For Lifestyle Use
Both shoes are excellent daily wear options:
- Gel-Kayano 32: Better for all-day standing or walking, thanks to plush cushioning and max stability
- GT-2000 14: A bit lighter and cooler, suitable for summer or anyone wanting mild support
For Running
- Kayano 32: Great for easy runs, recovery, and long distance, but not built for speed
- GT-2000 14: Can handle uptempo workouts, marathon pace training, and daily miles—perfect if you want some bounce and a touch of stability
Final Verdict
Choose the ASICS GT-2000 14 if you:
- Want a lighter, more responsive stability shoe
- Prefer mild to moderate support
- Do uptempo runs or want a versatile trainer for workouts and long runs
Choose the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 if you:
- Need maximum support with real arch control
- Prioritise softness and comfort over speed
- Use your shoes for long days on your feet, walking, or easy mileage
