Welcome to Flawless Shoe Reviews! Today we’re comparing two of the most popular stability running shoes on the market—the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32.
While both are stability shoes, they offer support in very different ways. Whether you’re using them for walking, standing all day, or daily runs, this review will help you understand which shoe works best for your needs.
Cushioning and Midsole Feel
One of the biggest differences between these two models is how they feel underfoot.
- Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 uses DNA Loft v3, a nitrogen-infused midsole that provides a balanced feel. It offers a soft landing but still pushes you back out for a responsive toe-off. It’s ideal for runners who want some cushioning without feeling like they’re sinking into the shoe.
- ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 uses FF Blast Plus Eco foam. This is a softer, more plush midsole that prioritises comfort. When your foot strikes the ground, you’ll sink in a little more than in the Adrenaline, giving it a cloud-like feel that’s perfect for long days on your feet or slower-paced runs.
Stability Systems
Both shoes are built for support—but the way they offer that support is quite different.
- Kayano 32 features ASICS’ 4D Guidance System, which includes:
- High sidewalls on the inside and outside to cradle your foot
- A broad base and sole flare for ground contact and balance
- A 4D guidance tab, which provides arch support using firmer foam under the midfoot
- Adrenaline GTS 24, on the other hand, uses the GuideRails® system:
- These denser foam rails run along both sides of the heel to limit excessive side-to-side motion
- They are more intrusive than ASICS’ 4D system and offer a more noticeable arch support feel
Check the latest price of the shoes below:
Heel Drop and Stack Height
This is another area where these shoes diverge:
- Adrenaline GTS 24 has a 12mm drop, with 35mm in the heel and 23mm in the forefoot. This higher drop is great for easing stress on the Achilles tendon, though it may put more pressure on the ball of the foot when standing for long periods.
- Kayano 32 comes in with a more moderate 8mm drop, featuring 40mm of cushioning in the heel and 32mm in the forefoot. This lower drop offers a more balanced platform, especially appealing for those who prefer a more level feel.
Upper Fit and Comfort
Both shoes offer a comfortable fit, but with some key differences:
- Gel-Kayano 32 has a broader toe box, plus a plush engineered mesh upper with a gusseted tongue. There’s more padding around the heel counter, and it includes a pull-on tab for easy wear.
- Adrenaline GTS 24 has a narrower toe box in the standard width (but comes in wide and extra wide). The tongue isn’t gusseted and is more padded, but the heel collar has slightly less cushioning than the Kayano.
Both are true to size and work well for different foot shapes, but those with wider forefeet may prefer the Kayano.
Running and Walking Performance
For Running:
- Adrenaline GTS 24 is lighter at around 283g (Men’s US 9), and its more responsive cushioning makes it better suited for tempo runs, strides, or moderate-speed workouts.
- Gel-Kayano 32 is heavier at around 300g, but its softer feel and stable ride make it excellent for long runs, easy miles, and recovery days.
For Walking or Standing All Day:
- If you need a shoe that offers soft, plush comfort, the Kayano 32 is a top choice.
- If you prefer a firmer ride with more prominent arch support, especially if you experience overpronation, the Adrenaline GTS 24 may be the better pick.
Check the latest price of the shoes below:
Final Thoughts
Both the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 are top-tier stability shoes—but they cater to slightly different needs.
- Choose the Adrenaline GTS 24 if you want firm support, noticeable arch control, and a faster feel.
- Go for the Gel-Kayano 32 if you want plush cushioning, subtle stability, and all-day comfort.
