The Hoka Clifton 10 and the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 are two of the most popular neutral running shoes on the market. While both offer high cushioning and comfort, they feel very different underfoot and are best suited to different uses—whether you’re walking, running, or on your feet all day. In this comparison, we’ll break down the key differences to help you decide which shoe is best for you.
Midsole and Cushioning Differences
Let’s begin with the most noticeable feature—the feel underfoot.
Hoka Clifton 10
The Clifton 10 maintains the same CMEVA cushioning found in the Clifton 9, but with added stack height:
- Heel: 42 mm
- Forefoot: 34 mm
- Drop: 8 mm
This is the largest heel-to-toe drop Hoka has used so far. The midsole feels softer than in the Clifton 9 and provides a plush, cushioned ride that’s ideal for slower-paced activities and walking.
ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27
The Nimbus 27 also features an 8 mm drop, but uses ASICS’ redesigned FF Blast+ Eco midsole:
- Heel: 43.5 mm
- Forefoot: 35.5 mm
This new midsole feels firmer and more energetic than the previous Nimbus 26. Combined with the more aggressive rocker geometry, it offers a noticeably springier ride, particularly during faster paces.
For a breakdown of the previous version, see our ASICS Gel-Nimbus 26 review.
Check the latest price on Amazon:
Stability and Ride Feel
Both are technically neutral shoes, but the way they offer support is quite different.
Clifton 10
- Features sidewalls on both the medial and lateral sides
- Subtle sole flare in the forefoot
- Broad base for added stability
Despite the structure, the Clifton 10 is softer than its predecessor, making it feel more like a classic neutral shoe rather than a stable neutral. The ride is smooth but not particularly responsive—best suited to recovery runs, walking, or standing.
Nimbus 27
- Less of a softness feeling compared to the Clifton 10
- Feels more responsive and capable of handling uptempo runs
- Features a sharper forefoot rocker and more defined heel bevel, making transitions quicker and more efficient
For runners who want one shoe that can handle both slow miles and short bursts of speed, the Nimbus 27 is the better option.
Fit and Upper Comfort
Both shoes have breathable uppers and structured heel counters, but the fit and volume differ.
Hoka Clifton 10
- Offers a wider fit than previous Hoka models (not as wide as the Bondi 8)
- Non-gusseted padded tongue
- Moderately stiff heel counter
- Higher volume through the upper, which benefits those needing more space over the instep
ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27
- More tapered fit in standard width
- Available in wide and extra wide
- Features a thin, gusseted tongue
- Extra padding around the heel collar and a pull tab for easier entry
- Slightly lower volume across the top of the foot
Both shoes have moderately stiff heel counters, which may be uncomfortable for those with heel bursitis or insertional Achilles tendonitis. In those cases, a shoe with more rearfoot flexibility may be a better option.
Check the latest price on Amazon:
Use Cases: Walking, Running, and More
While both shoes can handle daily mileage and casual use, there are distinctions in their strengths.
| Activity | Clifton 10 | Nimbus 27 |
|---|---|---|
| Walking | Excellent | Excellent |
| Standing all day | Excellent | Excellent |
| Easy daily runs | Excellent | Excellent |
| Recovery runs | Excellent | Excellent |
| Strides/speed work | Limited | Better suited |
| Long runs | Yes | Yes |
| Cushioned, stable ride | Softest feel | More responsive |
Final Thoughts: Which Should You Choose?
- Choose the Hoka Clifton 10 if you want a plush, soft, and supportive daily trainer. It’s ideal for walking, easy runs, and anyone who prefers a relaxed, cushioned feel.
- Choose the ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 if you want a springier, more responsive neutral shoe that can handle a mix of long runs and occasional uptempo sessions.
Both are excellent all-rounders, but they cater to slightly different preferences in ride feel and performance.
